3.4
1.
is rational function and the degree of the numerator
the degree of the denominator. So, we use the partial fraction expansion. Then
Putting these back into the equation above, we have
. Then
(b)
is a rational function with the degree of the numerato
the degree of the denominator. Then using the partial fraction expansion, we have
implies that
Put these back into the above equation. Then we have
. Thus,
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
(c)
is a rational function with the degree of the numerator is greater than the degree of the denominator. So, divide the numerator by the denominator. Then
as
to both sides. Then
. Then
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
(d)
is a rational function with the degree of the numerator is less than the degree of the denominator. So, using the partial fraction expansion, we have
. Then
.Furthermore,
implies
.Thus,
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
(e)
is a rational function with the degree of the numerator is less than the degree of the denominator. So, we might use the partial fraction expansion. But the numerator is already constant. It means that no more partial fraction expansion is necessary. In fact,
which is the original problem.
So, let
and use the integration by parts.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
Alternate solution (trig integral) Let
. Then
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
and
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
as follows:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |